In today’s post, I will discuss how El-Erian’s emerging market theme affects the dividend investors (DIs). Some of the characteristics that we DIs look for in a company are as follows:
- Management’s sincere conviction that shareholders have stake in the business and earnings must be shared with them;
- Dividends are paid from operating earnings;
- Consistent growth in dividends can be maintained only if there is consistent growth in earnings; and
- Dividend focused investing is a long term (i.e. 25-30 years) preposition.
Looking at the dividend aristocrats, one can see that they have had a pretty decent ride for the last 30-40 years on the back of growth in US economy. Along with the US economy, these companies were consistently growing their revenues (and hence the earnings). Managements consistently shared this bounty with the share holders. Now today, in general, dividend aristocrats as a group are struggling to find new source of growth in revenue and earnings. Most of the dividend aristocrats (not all of the companies) are focusing to increase earnings from internal efficiencies or cost reduction initiatives, because they are hard pressed for growth in revenue. How long this can continue? Dividend investing is long term process. Therefore, I foresee that the pool of companies in dividend aristocrat will continue to decrease.
For DIs, this is where the El-Erian’s emerging markets theme comes into play. According to the author, emerging markets will be growing faster and provide higher contribution to earnings in next 30-40 years. In that case, doesn’t it make sense to invest in dividend-based companies in emerging markets? For a moment let us think that international and emerging markets as foreign markets.
One of the issues for DIs is that there is very little public information on companies in foreign markets. If companies do not have ADRs then it is difficult, if not impossible, to find the details of such companies. Additionally, the regulatory framework and governance may not be as advanced as developed world. Here I am comparing the basic minimum requirements and not a full-proof system.
Other way to look at this is US companies or multinationals who get most of their earnings from foreign markets. Such companies have operating history, dividend payment history, management’s performance, presence in US markets, etc. Recently, there was an article on The Div-Net by Dividend Growth Investor which discussed about top 10 companies in S&P500 index and their source of earnings. This article brings out the fact that top 10 companies by weightage in S&P500 index (with approximately 22% contribution to index) derive 44% of total financial contribution from foreign markets. It is likely that if we dig deeper, we will find more such companies and this 44% contribution may even surpass 50% cumulatively for all S&P500 index companies. While we do not have the same investment vehicles as used in El-Erian’s example, the Harvard Endowment Fund, we DIs surely have US-based companies and/or multinational companies. Investing in such companies provide a very good vehicle for investing in international and/or emerging markets.
For us DIs, this is a good fit to El-Erian’s theme of long-term earnings growth in emerging markets. Also it helps us build dividend portfolio using the existing US financial infrastructure.




~
Should Companies Pay Dividends?
There are multiple school of thoughts on how companies should use the dollar generated with primary business activity (i.e. selling a product and/or services). Should the company pay back certain amount profits to shareholders or invest back into the business for further growth? To me, it depends upon the company, its business plans and objectives. Whether I prefer it or not depends upon what are my investment objectives.
In general, in developing industry sectors, the companies earn their profits by innovation, product uniqueness, time of market, etc. For examples, companies in technology, alternative energy, biotechnology, traditional pharmaceuticals, etc., sectors need heavy dollar investments to continue their growth and maintain competitiveness. The argument that all profit needs to be ploughed back into the business holds ground. Therefore, it is rare (if not impossible) that a growth-oriented company will provide dividends. Google, Intel, Microsoft, Apple, RIM, et. al., fall under such groups. Although it can be argued that some companies in technology sectors, such as Intel and Microsoft, are becoming more of a value (and perhaps dividend) play. There is nothing wrong in this argument and intentions of management of such companies. From my viewpoint, when such companies are at nascent stage, it is very difficult to understand them and their proposed business model for generating earnings. By the time they start demonstrating their potential with revenue and growth in market share, Mr. Market already prices them at higher multiples.
On the other hand, in mature industry sectors, the companies earn their profits by efficient execution and economies of scale. For example, companies in consumer staples, retails, real estate, banking, and technology services are the ones that depend heavily on these two factors. These sectors do not need large dollar investments for continued innovation. So if I am investing in these sectors, I expect management to share the profits with shareholders in the form of dividends. They do not have any strong argument that all profits need to be invested back into business for growth. When such companies are consistently paying and growing dividends, they are (1) ensuring that shareholders are an important part of their business; (2) shows management’s ability to be financially responsible; and (3) confidence that their business strategies will continue to generate earnings. Since most of the companies pay dividends from free cash flow, the likelihood of engineering the balance sheet is very low.
I believe both sides of the arguments are correct, similar to a glass being half empty or half full. An individual investor needs to view this from their investment goals and what they want to achieve.