Market Collision affecting Dividend Investors – Part II

In today’s post, I will discuss how El-Erian’s emerging market theme affects the dividend investors (DIs). Some of the characteristics that we DIs look for in a company are as follows:

  • Management’s sincere conviction that shareholders have stake in the business and earnings must be shared with them;
  • Dividends are paid from operating earnings;
  • Consistent growth in dividends can be maintained only if there is consistent growth in earnings; and
  • Dividend focused investing is a long term (i.e. 25-30 years) preposition.

Looking at the dividend aristocrats, one can see that they have had a pretty decent ride for the last 30-40 years on the back of growth in US economy. Along with the US economy, these companies were consistently growing their revenues (and hence the earnings). Managements consistently shared this bounty with the share holders. Now today, in general, dividend aristocrats as a group are struggling to find new source of growth in revenue and earnings. Most of the dividend aristocrats (not all of the companies) are focusing to increase earnings from internal efficiencies or cost reduction initiatives, because they are hard pressed for growth in revenue. How long this can continue? Dividend investing is long term process. Therefore, I foresee that the pool of companies in dividend aristocrat will continue to decrease.

For DIs, this is where the El-Erian’s emerging markets theme comes into play. According to the author, emerging markets will be growing faster and provide higher contribution to earnings in next 30-40 years. In that case, doesn’t it make sense to invest in dividend-based companies in emerging markets? For a moment let us think that international and emerging markets as foreign markets.

One of the issues for DIs is that there is very little public information on companies in foreign markets. If companies do not have ADRs then it is difficult, if not impossible, to find the details of such companies. Additionally, the regulatory framework and governance may not be as advanced as developed world. Here I am comparing the basic minimum requirements and not a full-proof system.

Other way to look at this is US companies or multinationals who get most of their earnings from foreign markets. Such companies have operating history, dividend payment history, management’s performance, presence in US markets, etc. Recently, there was an article on The Div-Net by Dividend Growth Investor which discussed about top 10 companies in S&P500 index and their source of earnings. This article brings out the fact that top 10 companies by weightage in S&P500 index (with approximately 22% contribution to index) derive 44% of total financial contribution from foreign markets. It is likely that if we dig deeper, we will find more such companies and this 44% contribution may even surpass 50% cumulatively for all S&P500 index companies. While we do not have the same investment vehicles as used in El-Erian’s example, the Harvard Endowment Fund, we DIs surely have US-based companies and/or multinational companies. Investing in such companies provide a very good vehicle for investing in international and/or emerging markets.

For us DIs, this is a good fit to El-Erian’s theme of long-term earnings growth in emerging markets. Also it helps us build dividend portfolio using the existing US financial infrastructure.

Market Collision affecting Dividend Investors – Part I


In the last post, I presented El-Erian’s major themes that are significantly affecting the financial markets. Taking these themes as a framework, the author presents the asset allocation model that was used under his stewardship at Harvard Endowment Fund. The asset allocation model can be found here and here.

The discussion of the asset allocation in this book should be viewed as reflection of author’s understanding of the world of finance. It is the result of author’s belief and conviction on how financial markets are evolving. I do not interpret this as a guideline, framework, or a model that I should follow. With the investment vehicles in this model, how can I?

Among others, one of the key characteristics of dividend-based investing is:

  • Management’s sincere conviction that shareholders have stake in the business and earnings must be shared with them;

Now let us compare this characteristics with one of El-Erian’s world colliding themes i.e. use of derivates and lack of financial infrastructure.

It is highly likely that dividend investors (DI) may not invest in funds, companies, and/or institutions that only do business in derivatives domain. Only because they do not have any background history associated with it. DI’s are looking for companies with dividend history and sincere managements. So in 2008 what went wrong with financial companies? Weren’t they good? Some of them had 20+ years of history and dividend growths. It can be argued that at hindsight, it is very easy to say considering what happened in 2008. Quite a few well-known financial institutions imploded due to these derivates. However, when we really put this in perspective, we can see that, in last few years these companies transitioned to greed and excessive use of derivates. Management did not know or understand how to access risk (lack of infrastructure!!). Perhaps, it also failed to communicate to shareholders that their business model has transitioned and they have highly leveraged balanced sheets. In my opinion, I believe management knew about this, but did not communicate due to their short term gains. I believe these folks are smart enough to understand these issues (did anyone make losses?) and were sincere to their own self. They had tight agreements in places to fill their own pockets irrespective of company performance. For example, Citibank CEO Chuck Prince’s famous words on front pages of Financial Times, “when the music stops it will be messy, but as long as it’s playing he’s on the dance floor….” What message was he trying to communicate? Companies such as JPM, USB, WFC, BBT, BAC, etc. also used derivates and got affected by this implosion. These companies are able to digest the loss (and not face extinction) because they managed it as per their risk-appetite. Isn’t that what we call management sincerity towards the company and its stakeholders? Where was risk management?

The author does not comment on whether to use or not use derivatives. All he is trying to bring out is derivatives and their risk management is not supported by existing financial infrastructure and governing mechanism.

In that case, I interpret this as it is acceptable for companies to use derivatives to an extent where risk of loss is understood and manageable. In other words, use it but do not over expose; one of the basic tenets of portfolio managements. So as a dividend investor, it would be acceptable to invest in somewhat riskier groups as long as I understand the downside and its implication on my overall portfolio.

Since the post is becoming long, I will discuss the theme of emerging markets in next post tomorrow.

More on this topic (What's this?)
Scheduled To Appear
Finding High-Yield Dividends Overseas
Read more on Asset Allocation, Dividends at Wikinvest

Main Themes in El-Erian’s Market Collision


In this book, Dr. El-Erian focuses on the changes taking place in the world economy. It is a big picture executive summary of the evolution taking place in world of finance across the globe. The author attempts to emphasize these changes by saying that these are signals and not noise. He then goes on to provide a framework for future investments and/or asset allocation.

At hindsight, this book may appear to be chaotic hodge-podge of multiple topics which does not provide any benefits to the average main street investor. It may seem to be oriented towards institutional financial managers; however, there is a lot one can learn from this book. As every coin as two sides, this book also has its positives and negatives. Putting the negativity aside, I viewed it in the context of broad overview and framework alone and not as a workbook for investments. I think that was author’s objective.

In this book, El-Erian is discussing three major themes in world financial markets, which are:

(1) Use of derivatives and lack of financial infrastructure;

(2) Changes taking place in emerging markets; and

(3) Money Flow – Role Reversal due to Sovereign Wealth Funds.

Use of derivatives and lack of financial infrastructure

Over the last decade, the financial companies and institutions have started using different forms of financial derivatives. The notion in all these financial derivatives is that one can securitize any financial transactions. The logic of this securitization process was that by grouping “many small units” in a “large single package”, the risk of any one small unit holder defaulting would be greatly reduced. However, one key element that went missing was that the financial infrastructure was not in place to govern these types of derivatives.

Let me put this in the context of real-estate financing. In general, traditional banks have changed their business model. They have stopped issuing mortgages for their own investment portfolio. They have started issuing mortgages to capture the loan origination fees. In the process, the banks (mortgage originators) shifted their focus from the borrowers’ long-term credit worthiness to accumulating the short-term gains. The goal was on quantity and not quality of loan. Anyways, originators then sold these individual mortgages to investment banking institutions for inclusion in bigger packages. These bigger packages were securitized and then were marketed to other investors. In absence of any governing mechanism, investors in these securitized mortgages had no idea of how to evaluate the risk of these securities and associated derivatives. The system broke down when bad quality of small unit (i.e. individuals) started defaulting in-mass.

Additionally, the financial system is also affected by how the money is coming into market, how it is used in markets, and how leverage is being used by institutions. Present system is designed for banks to be the only mechanism for money in-flows. However, now there are different ways such as hedge funds, private equity funds, investment banks, and domestic and foreign partners. Since these are not formal banking entities, they are not subject to the same regulations. The author expects this to change (Note – the book was published in early 2008).

This shapes author’s view on excessive use of derivatives and lack of governing infrastructure.



Changes taking place in emerging markets

Until over a decade ago, the overall economic performance of emerging markets (BRIC, Mexico, South Africa) was highly dependent on exports to the developed countries. The domestic consumption and demand was very small component and hence, did not have any significant effect on their state of economy. However, now, the economic scenario in these emerging countries is moving towards increased domestic consumption and demand. At the same time, the dependence on exports to developed countries is reducing. This is helping emerging economies to provide some level of support internally. This is reflected in increasing trend in their domestic savings and investments. Additionally, this is also aided by shifting patterns of demographic distribution. At least in China and India, with more than 2 billion population, the demographic is getting skewed towards younger generation. This is one aspect of change which the author is saying it is not a noise (it is a signal).

Money Flow – Role Reversal due to Sovereign Wealth Funds

The roots of Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs) can be traced back to oil producing countries (and Singapore to certain extent). These countries had significantly high inflows of cash from oil earnings. This cash flow was (or is) much higher than they can perhaps consume internally. Therefore, it was deployed in developed world in the form of short-to-medium term government debt instruments. The author believes this is role reversal. The developed countries are being subjected to capital flows governed by SWFs (i.e. other nations). This is another aspect that author believes needs to watched closely. Depending upon the monetary and fiscal response of developed world, it is likely that SWF money managers may change their investment strategy from government debt instruments to equities and/or high interest rate instruments.



With these three major themes, the author than goes on to demonstrate how these themes were used for asset allocation model at Harvard Endowment Fund. There is an interesting viewpoint of this asset allocation (here and here) from the context of asset correlation. This asset allocation model is more oriented towards the institutional investments with large funding base. The investment vehicles, resources, and perhaps their accessibility are not from the average investor’s viewpoint. Unfortunately, this is where the book gets disconnected from the main street investors like me.

In the next post, I will discuss my interpretation of these conceptual framework and themes from the perspective of dividend-based investing.

Book Reviews



Being an avid proponent of dividend-based investing, whenever I read any financial or general economics book, I am continuously attempting to put the subject matter in the context of dividend-based investing. I am trying to figure out if it should have any influence in my investment process. Recently, I read the book titled “When Markets Collide – Investment Strategies for the Age of Global Economic Change” written by Mohammed El-Erian.



Therefore, in next few posts, I will be:

(1) Summarizing the main themes of the book;

(2) Present my interpretation from dividend-investing perspective; and

(3) Discuss whether it has any influence on my investing process (if any).



So stay tuned!

Should Companies Pay Dividends?

There are multiple school of thoughts on how companies should use the dollar generated with primary business activity (i.e. selling a product and/or services). Should the company pay back certain amount profits to shareholders or invest back into the business for further growth? To me, it depends upon the company, its business plans and objectives. Whether I prefer it or not depends upon what are my investment objectives.

In general, in developing industry sectors, the companies earn their profits by innovation, product uniqueness, time of market, etc. For examples, companies in technology, alternative energy, biotechnology, traditional pharmaceuticals, etc., sectors need heavy dollar investments to continue their growth and maintain competitiveness. The argument that all profit needs to be ploughed back into the business holds ground. Therefore, it is rare (if not impossible) that a growth-oriented company will provide dividends. Google, Intel, Microsoft, Apple, RIM, et. al., fall under such groups. Although it can be argued that some companies in technology sectors, such as Intel and Microsoft, are becoming more of a value (and perhaps dividend) play. There is nothing wrong in this argument and intentions of management of such companies. From my viewpoint, when such companies are at nascent stage, it is very difficult to understand them and their proposed business model for generating earnings. By the time they start demonstrating their potential with revenue and growth in market share, Mr. Market already prices them at higher multiples.

On the other hand, in mature industry sectors, the companies earn their profits by efficient execution and economies of scale. For example, companies in consumer staples, retails, real estate, banking, and technology services are the ones that depend heavily on these two factors. These sectors do not need large dollar investments for continued innovation. So if I am investing in these sectors, I expect management to share the profits with shareholders in the form of dividends. They do not have any strong argument that all profits need to be invested back into business for growth. When such companies are consistently paying and growing dividends, they are (1) ensuring that shareholders are an important part of their business; (2) shows management’s ability to be financially responsible; and (3) confidence that their business strategies will continue to generate earnings. Since most of the companies pay dividends from free cash flow, the likelihood of engineering the balance sheet is very low.


I believe both sides of the arguments are correct, similar to a glass being half empty or half full. An individual investor needs to view this from their investment goals and what they want to achieve.

Personal Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory ~