<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dividend Tree &#187; K</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dividendtree.net/tag/k/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dividendtree.net</link>
	<description>My journey of planting dividend investment seeds and watching it grow....</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:21:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Kelloggs Company– Stock Analysis for Dividend Portfolio</title>
		<link>http://www.dividendtree.net/analysis/kelloggs-company%e2%80%93-stock-analysis-for-dividend-portfolio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dividendtree.net/analysis/kelloggs-company%e2%80%93-stock-analysis-for-dividend-portfolio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dividend Tree</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dividend Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dividends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic asset class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kelloggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kelloggs corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable dividends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dividendtree.net/?p=1186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kellogg is stable and slow growth company. It is expected to continue to have a good cash flow over next few years. It is not typical dividend growth company where dividends grow in excess of 10%. However, one can expect K to provide stability of dividends in the portfolio. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1189" title="logo_kelloggs" src="http://www.dividendtree.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/logo_kelloggs.gif" alt="logo_kelloggs" width="150" height="58" />Kellogg&#8217;s Company (K) is a leading producer of ready-to-eat cereal, and also sells convenience foods such as cookies, crackers, cereal bars, fruit snacks, and frozen waffles.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;">For starter, K is neither a Dividend Aristocrat nor member of Broad Dividend Achiever. This is primarily because it had flat dividends between 2001 and 2004. However, it has paid consistent and stable dividends (without cutting) since 1985. The most recent dividend increase was in August 2009. My objective here is to analyze if how it rates on my scale of risk-to-dividends.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span id="more-1186"></span><span id="fullpost"> </span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="color: #3333ff; font-weight: bold;">Trend Analysis</span><br />
Here I am looking at trends for past 9 years of company’s revenue and profitability. These parameters should show consistently growth trends. The trend charts and data summary are shown in images below.</span></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Revenue: </span> In general, a growing trend since 2002. The average revenue growth for last 9 years has been approximately 7.3%. The company raised the year 2009 revenue estimate.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cash Flows:</span> Overall, a very slow and anemic increasing trend of free cash flow and operating cash flow. FCF is more or less similar to net income, but 2008 FCF was 80% of net income.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">EPS from continuing operation:</span> In general, it had an increasing trend from 2001 onwards. It has raised its EPS estimate for full year 2009.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Dividends per share:</span> On ten year basis an anemic dividend growth. It remained constant between 2001 and 1004.</span></li>
</ul>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter" style="text-align: justify;">
<dl id="attachment_1187" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><a href="http://www.dividendtree.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/K-Trend-Analysis.gif" rel="thumbnail"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1187" title="K Trend Analysis" src="http://www.dividendtree.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/K-Trend-Analysis-300x171.gif" alt="Kellogg: Trend Analysis" width="300" height="171" /></a></span></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd">Kellogg: Trend Analysis</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="color: #3333ff; font-weight: bold;">Risk Parameter Calculation</span><br />
Here I use the corporation’s financial health to assign a risk number for <a href="../analysis/investment-process/performance-measure-for-risk-to-dividend/">measuring risk-to-dividends</a>. The risk number for risk-to-dividends is 1.86. This is a medium risk category as per my 3-point risk scale. The slow EPS growth rate and relatively reduced gross margins is making this as medium risk to dividends.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-weight: bold; color: #3333ff;">Quality of Dividends</span><br />
This section measures the dividend growth rate, duration of growth, consistency over a period of past five years.<br />
</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span id="fullpost"> </span></span></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Dividend growth rate: </span>The average dividend growth of 4.1% (stdev. 3.1%) is less than average EPS growth rate of 11.9% (stdev. 15%).</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Duration of dividend growth: </span>Dividends have never been cut since 1985. However, they have remained constant between 2001 and 2004.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">4 year rolling dividend growth rate for past ten years: </span> Less than 10%.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;">Payout factor: It has been less than 50% since 2004.</span></li>
<li> <span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Dividend cash flow vs. income from MMA: </span>Here, I analyze how the dividend cash flow stacks up against the income from FDIC insured money market account. The baseline assumption is (a) stock is yielding 3.04%; and (b) MMA yield is 2.9%. With my projected dividend growth of 4.1%, the dividend cash flow is 1.16 times the MMA income in 10 years time period. For dividend cash flow to be twice the MMA income, the pricing has to be $29.77 (i.e. yield 4.8%).</span></li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-weight: bold; color: #3333ff;">Fair Value Calculation</span><br />
This section determines what price I should pay to buy a given stock</span></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;">Net present value (NPV) price based on 15 year DCF: $35.1</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;">Average high yield price calculated based on past 10 years: $43.2</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"> Pricing based on past 10 year relative price-to-earnings ratio. $37.6</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"> Pricing based on price-to-earnings ratio of 12: $33.0</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"> Graham number: $24.5</span></li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;">The range of fair value is calculated as $30.3 to $37.2.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-weight: bold; color: #3333ff;">Qualitative Analysis</span><br />
Kellogg&#8217;s Company was incorporated in 1922. It paid consistently growing dividends from 1985 to 2001. The acquisition of Keebler Foods Co halted this growth and dividends remained flat until 2001. The dividends have started growing back again since 2005 onwards.</span></p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;">Its revenue is pretty much focuses in North America which contributes 66% of the revenue. Europe has 20%, Latin America 8%, and Asia Pacific as 6%.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"> It continues to have stable gross and operating margins. It generates relatively stable (albeit not growing) operating and free cash flows.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"> As with any branded consumer staples, Kellogg faces risk from private label products.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"> Kellogg expects to continue increase EPS by the combination of operating cost discipline, share buy backs, and moderate sales based growth.</span></li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-weight: bold; color: #3333ff;">Conclusion</span><br />
Kellogg&#8217;s is stable and slow growth company. It is expected to continue to have a good cash flow over next few years. It is not typical dividend growth company where dividends grow in excess of 10%. However, one can expect K to provide stability of dividends in the portfolio. On relative basis to its peers, it is a conservative company with controlled balance sheet which provides room for growth through acquisitions and/or growth of its various brands. The stock’s current risk-to-dividend rating is 1.86 (medium risk). The current pricing of $50.17 is above my buy range. However, I would be open to adding to my existing position when it is near to my buy range and my allocation allows the additions.</span>
</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Full Disclosure:</span> Long on K. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><em>This article originally appeared on <a href="http://www.thediv-net.com/2009/10/kellogg-company-stock-analysis-for.html">The DIV-Net</a> on October 22, 2009</em></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><em><br />
</em></span></p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts that You May Like to Read:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.dividendtree.net/analysis/waste-management-inc-stock-analysis-for-dividend-growth-portfolio/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Waste Management Inc &#8211; Stock Analysis for Dividend Growth Portfolio</a></li><li><a href="http://www.dividendtree.net/analysis/brown-and-brown-a-mid-cap-dividend-growth-company/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Brown and Brown &#8211; A Mid Cap Dividend Growth Company</a></li><li><a href="http://www.dividendtree.net/analysis/sysco-corporation-stock-analysis-priced-to-buy/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">SYSCO Corporation Stock Analysis &#8211; Priced to Buy</a></li><li><a href="http://www.dividendtree.net/analysis/graco-inc-company-with-high-risk-to-dividend-growth/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Graco Inc &#8211; Company with High Risk to Dividend Growth</a></li><li><a href="http://www.dividendtree.net/analysis/kimberly-clark-high-risk-dividend-growth-stock/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Kimberly-Clark: High Risk Dividend Growth Stock</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dividendtree.net/analysis/kelloggs-company%e2%80%93-stock-analysis-for-dividend-portfolio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dividends Keep Inching Upwards</title>
		<link>http://www.dividendtree.net/commentary/dividends-keep-inching-upwards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dividendtree.net/commentary/dividends-keep-inching-upwards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dividend Tree</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dividend increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies with sustainable dividends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dividend Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dividend news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Wiley & Sons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JW.A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kelloggs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medtronic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VZ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dividendtree.net/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among quite a few dividend raises this quarter, following were few selected ones that I was have been reading about as potential dividend growth opportunities. Verizon Communication (VZ): The 2Q09 earning per share was $0.52 (vs. $0. in 1Q09). The key highlight was reduced earnings on y-o-y basis (vs. $0.66 in 1Q08). There was y-o-y [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Among quite a few dividend raises this quarter, following were few selected ones that I was have been reading about as potential dividend growth opportunities.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"><strong> </strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>Verizon Communication (VZ):</strong> The 2Q09 earning per share was $0.52 (vs. $0. in 1Q09).</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The key highlight was reduced earnings on      y-o-y basis (vs. $0.66 in 1Q08).</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">There was y-o-y growth in operating revenue (11.3%)      and free cash flow.</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Quarterly dividend of      $0.46/share is barely getting covered with earnings. This quarter’s payout      ratio is at 88%.</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"><strong> </strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"><strong> </strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"><strong><span id="more-850"></span>Kellogg Company (K):</strong> The 2Q09 earning per share was $0.92 (vs. $0.84 in 3Q09).</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The highlight was 12% increase in EPS on y-o-y      basis.</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Increased EPS seems to be due to controlled      operating expenses that includes cost cutting initiatives.</span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Quarterly dividend of $0.375/share is well      covered with earnings. This quarter’s payout ratio is 40%.</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"><strong> </strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <strong>Medtronic (MDT):</strong> The year 2009 earnings per share was $1.93 (vs. $1.95 in 2008).</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The highlights were increased revenue (8%), and      free cash flow. </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Annual dividend of $0.82/share is well covered      with earnings. The annual payout ratio is 42%. </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">MDT is a dividend achiever. The most recent      dividend increase was 9% in July 2009.</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> <strong>John Wiley &amp; Sons (JA.A):</strong> The year 2009 earnings per share was $2.15 (vs. $2.49 in 2008).</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">The key highlights were growth in revenue (3.4%),      free cash flow (40%), and EPS (22%) with currency neutral. The reduction      in EPS was due to currently fluctuations. Decreased debt by 10%. </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">Annual dividend of $0.56/share is very well      covered. The annual payout ratio is 26%. </span></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;">JA.A is dividend achiever. The most recent      dividend increase was 8% in July 2009 and is its 16<sup>th</sup> consecutive      dividend increase.</span></span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: verdana,geneva;"><span style="font-size: small;"> These are few ones that I will be presenting my analysis in next few weeks. In this John Wiley and Sons gave me a surprise by low payout ratio, 8% increase, and 16<sup>th</sup> consecutive increase.</span></span></p>
<div id="crp_related"><h3>Related Posts that You May Like to Read:</h3><ul><li><a href="http://www.dividendtree.net/commentary/mcd-and-mmm-dividends-are-covered/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">MCD and MMM Dividends are Covered</a></li><li><a href="http://www.dividendtree.net/commentary/four-stocks-with-sustainable-dividends/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Four Stocks with Sustainable Dividends</a></li><li><a href="http://www.dividendtree.net/dividend-increase/three-companies-with-sustainable-dividends/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Three Companies with Sustainable Dividends</a></li><li><a href="http://www.dividendtree.net/dividend-increase/three-small-companies-demostrate-resilence-by-dividend-increase/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Three Small Companies Demostrate Resilence by Dividend Increases</a></li><li><a href="http://www.dividendtree.net/dividend-increase/clarcor-and-conagra-can-sustain-dividends/" rel="bookmark" class="crp_title">Clarcor and ConAgra can Sustain Dividends</a></li></ul></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dividendtree.net/commentary/dividends-keep-inching-upwards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
